How to Recognize Bad Arguments

5 Lessons • 17m • Multiple Instructors

How to Recognize Bad Arguments

This class, featuring insights from experts like Steven Pinker and Gary Marcus, equips learners with critical thinking tools to navigate biases, understand scientific research, and make informed decisions in a media-saturated world, emphasizing the importance of questioning assumptions and grounding perceptions in data.
A grid with two grayscale portraits of older men with glasses and curly hair, separated by pink and orange geometric shapes.

Let Data Drive Your Decision Making

Cognitive psychologist Steven Pinker emphasizes that to achieve a realistic understanding of the world, we must prioritize data and trends over emotionally-driven headlines and anecdotes, as news media can distort our perception of reality.

Let Data Drive Your Decision Making

Why We Need to Look Critically at Eye-Catching Studies

The "Replicability Crisis," particularly in behavioral sciences, raises concerns about the validity of scientific studies, prompting psychology professor Gary Marcus to advocate for critical reading of research and the use of essential questions to evaluate reported results.

Why We Need to Look Critically at Eye-Catching Studies

How Vulnerable Are You to Fake News and Urban Legends?

The mere-exposure effect, explained by Robert Zajonc, reveals that repeated exposure to stimuli fosters familiarity and bias, influencing our preferences and beliefs, which writer Derek Thompson explores in a video lesson highlighting its implications for individuals and organizations.

How Vulnerable Are You to Fake News and Urban Legends?

Heighten Your Sensitivity to Rhetorical Tricks

Philosopher Daniel C. Dennett identifies rhetorical strategies, such as the use of "surely" and "rather," that indicate potential weaknesses in arguments, highlighting the need for further scrutiny in discussions influenced by emotional manipulation and power dynamics.

Heighten Your Sensitivity to Rhetorical Tricks

Follow Rapoport’s Rules

Constructive criticism often falls short in practice, but Daniel C. Dennett offers rules for intelligent dissent that emphasize clarity, acknowledgment of the target's ideas, and agreement on shared points before presenting any criticism to foster a more respectful dialogue.

Follow Rapoport’s Rules

This class delves into the intricacies of understanding information in a media-saturated world, featuring insights from experts like cognitive psychologist Steven Pinker and psychology professor Gary Marcus. Pinker emphasizes the importance of grounding our perceptions in data rather than sensational headlines, urging us to confront our cognitive biases and make decisions based on objective trends. Marcus tackles the “Replicability Crisis” in scientific research, encouraging critical reading of studies and highlighting the necessity of multiple studies to establish reliable conclusions. Together, these lessons underscore the need for a more discerning approach to information consumption.

Additional insights from writer Derek Thompson and philosopher Daniel C. Dennett further enrich the class. Thompson explores the mere-exposure effect, illustrating how familiarity can distort our perception of truth, while Dennett offers strategies for recognizing rhetorical pitfalls and providing constructive criticism. By equipping learners with tools to navigate biases and enhance critical thinking, this class empowers individuals to cultivate a more nuanced understanding of reality. Ultimately, it emphasizes the importance of questioning our assumptions and making informed decisions in an increasingly complex information landscape.