Skip to content
Culture & Religion

Why eating Chinese food on Christmas is an American Jewish tradition

For Chinese restaurants Christmas is their Superbowl Sunday. But how did Chinese food become a staple of the holidays for some?
Sign up for Big Think on Substack
The most surprising and impactful new stories delivered to your inbox every week, for free.

Chinese food on Christmas day has become a popular tradition among the American Jewish community. When everything else shuts down, call the local Chinese place to get some dinner. But do these restaurants really see that much traffic from customers on Christmas day?


Roberto A. Ferdman of the Washington Post investigated Google’s search trends for Chinese food throughout the year. There’s a considerable spike around December 25th for queries relating to “Chinese food” that date back to 2004 (when Google’s trend data first became available).

Ferdman also notes that GrubHub reported a significant spike in past sales for Chinese restaurants on Christmas day, making it something of a Superbowl Sunday for the cuisine. Ed Schoenfeld, owner of RedFarm, confirmed this phenomena when he spoke to Adam Chandler of The Atlantic:

“Clearly this whole thing with Chinese food and Jewish people has evolved. There’s no question. Christmas was always a good day for Chinese restaurants, but in recent years, it’s become the ultimate day of business.”

As to why the tradition has become so heavily associated with the Jewish community, it may have started as the only dining option available, but has evolved into a Jewish American tradition.

Chandler reveals a far-deeper bond between the Chinese and Jewish communities that goes back to the years between 1899 and 1911 when the latter’s population spiked in New York City from immigration. Their relationship starts with their similarities as the non-Christian others in America during that time, and continued with Chinese restaurants as one of the few places where Jews could get semi-Kosher food. Where Mexican, Italian, and American restaurants mix an overwhelming amount of dairy and meat together, Chinese restaurants offered an acceptable foreign alternative.

Schoenfeld said to Chandler:

Chinese restaurants were the easiest place to trick yourself into thinking you were eating Kosher food.

It’s a symbiotic relationship that has gown over the years into an unique American tradition for these cultures, bringing people together in ways we never thought.

Read more atThe Washington PostandThe Atlantic

Photo Credit: Shutterstock

Sign up for Big Think on Substack
The most surprising and impactful new stories delivered to your inbox every week, for free.

Related
  Novelist Jonathan Safran Foer wants you to stop eating meat—not because he cares so much about the fluffy animals, but because it’s killing the environment. In his Big Think interview Foer shared with us just how devastating the factory farm industry is, something he learned while researching his first work of non-fiction, Eating Animals. “Animal agriculture is the number one cause of global warming, and yet very few people, including people who are normally quite political and quite moral and moralizing, talk about it.  And even fewer people act on their concerns about where food comes from.” The reason changing Americans’ eating habits is so difficult is because eating meat is ingrained in our cultural narratives as Americans. “Food is not just fact and it’s not just reason; it’s culture, it’s personal identity,” Foer says. “It’s what our parents and our grandparents fed us, it’s how we think of ourselves, and it’s always attached to some kind of a story.  And that confuses things.  The Thanksgiving turkey confuses things.  The Christmas ham confuses things.  Every family has its own version.” And creating a new narrative that excludes meat will be tough largely because Americans are subsidized to eat this way. American farm subsidies lower the price of meat while encouraging inhumane and environmentally damaging farming practices, so much so that the real cost of a 50-cent hamburger, factoring in environmental costs, is actually $200. Plus, the subsidies hamstring farmers that use traditional, non-industrial methods of farming: “We have now created an economic system which is very advantageous to feed animals unnaturally, house them unnaturally, and raise genetic stocks that are destined for illness,” Foer says.  “And the small farmers, who are really the heroes of my book, farmers at places like Niman Ranch, farmers like Frank Reese at Good Shepard, farmers like Paul Willis, are at a severe economic disadvantage for doing things the right way; for being environmentally responsible; for treating their animals like animals rather than like rocks or pieces of wood.” Foer told us that change is very necessary but possible, debunking the idea that industrialized factory farming is necessary to feed the world. The idea that factory farming is necessary to feed the nearly 7 billion inhabitants of earth is “not only untrue, it’s the opposite of the truth,” he says. “It takes seven calories of food input into an animal to produce one calorie of food output.  It’s an extraordinarily inefficient way to produce food.” And if the Chinese and Indians begin to eat like American do, which has been the trend in the developing world, “we’re going to have to farm twice as many animals as we do now.” That would amount to 100 billion animals every year.  Foer also spoke to us about his fiction work, telling us that he values the freedom of fiction but that the same freedom is what makes fiction so difficult. And he gave us his take on the film adaptation of his debut novel “Everything Is Illuminated” as well as his thoughts about the form of the novel in the age of the iPad. Literature has always been “slower than the other art forms to grapple with technological and cultural changes…and I think that’s one of the things that people love so much about it,” he said. Whereas music and the visual arts have changed dramatically in the past 100 years, literature has remained largely the same. “Maybe it’s been the saving grace of literature to be so conservative,” Foer muses. “But maybe it will contribute to its death.”    

Up Next