L.A. Times Won’t Print Letters from Climate Change Deniers
Paul Thorton, the L.A. Times’ letters editor explained the difference between opinions and factual inaccuracies in defending his decision not to print letters that challenge the certainty “that we fossil-fuel-burning humans are driving global warming.”
Sign up for Big Think on Substack
The most surprising and impactful new stories delivered to your inbox every week, for free.
Paul Thorton, the L.A. Times’ letters editor explained the difference between opinions and factual inaccuracies in defending his decision not to print letters that challenge the certainty “that we fossil-fuel-burning humans are driving global warming.”
You can read Thorton’s full explanation here, but in a nutshell, here it is:
I do my best to keep errors of fact off the letters page; when one does run, a correction is published. Saying “there’s no sign humans have caused climate change” is not stating an opinion, it’s asserting a factual inaccuracy.
What do you think?
Image courtesy of Shutterstock
Sign up for Big Think on Substack
The most surprising and impactful new stories delivered to your inbox every week, for free.
